oppn parties Why is Pakistan Perturbed Over India's Hot Pursuit Policy

News Snippets

  • Government to introduce PF for self-emplyed and gig workers
  • Crush at Puri Rathyatra leaves 2 dead and 78 injured
  • NEET-UG, marred in controversy due to pape4r leak, saw a huge increase in top scores as two scored 715/720 and 11.2 lkah candidates cleared the exam
  • India's first hydrogen-powered train will be flagged off by PM Modi from Jind in Haryana
  • Delhi HC asks the government to monitor Sona Wnagchuk's health regularly
  • TMC Rajya Sabha MP Koel Mallick resigns from her seat, leaves TMC. Mamata asks all those wishing to leave the party to do so before July 21
  • Calcutta HC says land deed is not a proof of citizenship. Refuses to provide protection to a man facing deportation on basis of land deed
  • Supreme Court tells the government to teach the third language in the 3-language formula in Class 6 and not Class 9
  • Government to take steps to boost liquidity for small businesses
  • RBI says that banks cannot sell seized assets back to the defaulters
  • Centre decides to take equity stakes in semiconductor startups
  • Markets remain flat on Thursday: Sensex closes just 1 point ahead and Nifty ended 5 point lower
  • BCCI:Selectors have possibly decided that Rohit Sharma will not be selected for ODIs after the Lord's game on Sunday
  • Japan Open badminton: P V Sindhu stuns world no. 5 Han Yue of China 21-16, 21-14 to enter the quarterfinals
  • 2nd ODI versus England: Indian batting fails miserably except Gill, Kohli and Iyer to score just 233 all out. England win by 4 wickets
Supreme Court clarifies that it has not issued a blanket ban on use of bulldozers, and they can be used after compliance with procedure laid down in civil laws
oppn parties
Why is Pakistan Perturbed Over India's Hot Pursuit Policy

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2015-09-24 17:19:26

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Author of Cyber Scams in India, Digital Arrest, The Money Trap and The Human Hack
A clinical and efficient strike by the Indian army against enemies of the Indian state in Myanmar and several statements by Indian ministers and politicians have raised Pakistan’s hackle. People like former PM Pervez Musharaf has said that India should not make the mistake of attacking Pakistan as they have not developed nuclear capability to fire at ceremonial occasions like Shab e Baraat. Others have pointed out that Pakistan is not Myanmar.

Those in Pakistan who are commenting in this vein have forgotten two things: one, Pakistan has always maintained that there are no terrorist camps in Pakistan and no terrorists cross from its country to India and two, any such operation in a foreign country must necessarily be conducted with the expressed permission and help of that country.

So why is Pakistan perturbed? It should continue to maintain its sham position that it does not aid, abet and harbor militants who strike at Indian targets after crossing over, even though its army chief says that Kashmir is the “unfinished agenda of 1947.” If India ever requests permission to strike at terror camps in Pakistan, it should deny their existence with a plain face. Instead, it should accuse India of trying to destabilize their country. This should go on and both countries should continue to build up conventional and nuclear arsenals and ignore developing their countries. This is what the people of both countries deserve for being dumb enough to keep supporting governments that have never seriously tried to resolve differences between the two neighbours.

Has any minister said that India will undertake pre-emptive strikes against terrorists inside Pakistani territory? Then where does the question of violating or challenging the “territorial integrity” of Pakistan arises? But people in Pakistan are already warning India against taking actions that might be deemed as such.

Pakistan itself continues to carry out one misadventure after another, all aimed at needling India and testing its patience. Its ambassador in India routinely meets Kashmiri separatists before talking to the Indian government, making bilateral talks look like trilateral. Despite India’s strong protests, it went ahead with local elections in Pakistan occupied Kashmir (PoK) recently. It continues to provide moral, financial and technical (including weapons, training and logistics) aid to all sorts of Kashmiri groups. But it continues to deny all this, chiefly in order to be on the right side of the US war against terrorism. It is a travesty of justice that the US considers the biggest sponsor of terrorism to be its bulwark in the fight against the evil. The US funds Pakistan substantially to fight terrorism. Most of the funds end up in financing terrorists.

Hence, adopting extreme postures in the wake of the Indian operation in Myanmar is not going to help Pakistan. It will have to cross the bridge of hot pursuit if India ever asks its permission and cooperation to undertake such an operation on its territory. It will be interesting how Pakistan responds to such a request from India, with the international community watching.