oppn parties Why Pick on NGOs: Civil Society Should be Given Space to Dissent

News Snippets

  • In reply to a question in Parliament, the government says it is empowered to lawfully intercept, monitor or decrpyt information stored in a computer resource in the interest of sovereignty or integrity of India
  • Police stop a 12-year old girl on her way to the Sabarimala shrine
  • In Karnataka, the JD(S) indicates that it might support the BJP government if it falls short of numbers after the bypolls
  • Congress pips the BJP in local body elections in Rajasthan, winning 961 wards to the BJPs 737
  • After Airtel and Vodafone-Idea, Jio also indicates that tariffs will be raised from December
  • Sources in Shiv Sena say that they might revive the alliance with the BJP if it offers the 50:50 deal
  • A miffed Sanjay Rout of the Shiv Sena says that it will take "100 births" to understand Sharad Pawar
  • Mobile operators Vodafone-Idea and Airtel decide to raise tariffs from next month
  • Sharad Pawar meets Sonia Gandhi and says more time needed for government formation in Maharashtra
  • Justice S A Bobde sworn in as the 47th Chief Justice of India
  • Supreme Court holds hotels liable for theft of vehicle from their parking area if parked by valet, says "owner's risk" clause is not a shield from such liability
  • Finance Minister says she is receiving feedback from many sectors that recovery is happening as there is lower stress
  • Sabarimala temple opens, but police bar the entry of women below 50 years
  • Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman says Air India and BPCL to be sold off by March
  • Media person Rajat Sharma resigns as DDCA president
Two Muslim litigants in Ayodhya refuse to accept the Supreme Court order, say review petition might be filed
oppn parties
Why Pick on NGOs: Civil Society Should be Given Space to Dissent

By Sunil Garodia

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Writes for a number of publications.
After the Prime Minister’s remark at a judges’ conclave that the judiciary was under pressure from “five star activists” and the media, the recent crackdown on NGO’s, including Greenpeace and the Ford Foundation, is not very surprising. Despite touting “minimum government, maximum governance” as his party’s slogan, Narendra Modi’s government is trying to squeeze agencies who are doing extremely good work in areas where the government has no reach. It smacks of maximum government.

NGO’s are doing pioneering work in many fields. In many other fields, they are helping Indian universities, institutions and individuals to take up work that is benefitting large sections of our society through their liberal grants. Some of this work is at variance with stated government policy. The government feels that these NGO’s create hurdles in the path of development. Hence, it goes ahead and cancels the FCRA licenses of nearly 9000 NGO’s, ostensibly for not filing their annual returns regularly. Legally, the government cannot be faulted for this decision. If the NGO’s need to file certain papers with the authorities, they must do so in time. But coming at a time like this, it seems a measure to make them fall in line. Squeezing the source of funds is the best way to kill any initiative for good deeds cannot be done by good intentions or good words only.

The PM’s ire at what he called “five star activists” is mainly due to the fact that some NGO’s and their visible faces try to protect people’s rights by filing PIL’s in the courts to counter government hamhandedness. The ire against Greenpeace is rooted in its opposition to India’s civil nuclear programme without proper safeguards. The ire against Ford Foundation is for the support it gives to Teesta Setalvad’s NGO, among others.

As the Modi government embarks on a journey of rapid infrastructure growth and industrialization, it knows that the one stumbling block could be the NGOs â€" long known as the idealist jholawallahs. That perception needs to be changed now. NGO’s have become savvy. Thanks mainly to the internet, they have the latest inputs and resources at their finger tips. They employ hotshot MBAs. Top lawyers represent them in court cases. In fact, they are playing the role of the opposition much better than most opposition parties in India.

The fact is that the government needs to be opposed and checked at times when it seeks to bulldoze its way in or out of situations where the rights of thousands are affected. The government cannot say that we will allow the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation to help NGOs fight child trafficking and AIDS while we will not allow Greenpeace to agitate against civil nuclear plants. It has to allow the good work with what it considers to be “bad” work. For, the work is not bad. There is due judicial process in the country. The NGO’s just subject government decisions to this judicial process. Or they create awareness and organize protest against some decisions that are instantly applied.

Instead of trying to stifle informed dissent, a government that is seeking to use minimum government should involve these “five star activists” and their lesser known but maybe more knowledgeable and experienced counterparts, in the process of decision making. They are the ones working on the ground and with the people and are more aware of the implications of the policies. Civil society has a stake in how government shapes its policies. This is a fact no government can ignore.