oppn parties Bank Deposits Are As Safe As Before

News Snippets

  • NCLT initiates bankruptcy proceedings against former Videocon chairman Venugopal Dhoot for defaulting on loans of Rs 6158cr as personal guarantor in two group companies
  • LIC approves 1:1 bonus share issue
  • Gold and silver futures also go down by 0.7% and 2.2% respectively
  • Stocks tumbled again on Monday as crude prices rose: Sensex went down by 703 points and Nifty by 207 points
  • Supreme Court refuses to cancel the land-for-jobs FIR against Lalu Prasad
  • The spectre of El Nino haunts India: IMD predicts 'below normal ' monsoon this year
  • Labour protest over increase in wages by 35% (as per Haryana example) turns violent in Noida, nearly 200 were detained by the police
  • Congress leader Sonia Gandhi said that the delimitation exercise must be carried out after the Census is complete
  • PM Modi says Parliament is on the verge of creating history as the Houses get ready to take up the women's reservation bills
  • Tata Sons chairman N Chandrasekaran said that TCS COO Aarthi Subramanian is conducting a thorough inquiry to establish facts and identify individuals involved in the sexual harassment allegations at the company's Nashik office
  • Asha Bhonsle laid to rest with full state honours on Monday in Mumbai
  • AAP leader Arvind Kejriwal once again approached the Delhi HC to request the recusal of a judge from his case
  • Candidates Chess: R Vaishali on the verge of creating history, but needs two wins - one with black pieces - against formidable opponents to emerge as the challenger
  • Rohit Sharma, who retired hurt in the match versus RCB, underwent scans for possible hamstring injury
  • IPL: Abhishek Sharma fails for SRH but Ishan Kishan (91) shines. Then, Vaibhav Sooryavanshi fails for RR and SRH bolwers, especially unheralded Praful Hinge (4 for 24) and Sakib Hussain (4 for 24) win it for SRH. This was the first loss for table-toppers RR
Supreme Court questions Election Commission about SIR SOP and why logical discrepancy was introduced only in Bengal
oppn parties
Bank Deposits Are As Safe As Before

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2017-12-15 08:37:33

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Author of Cyber Scams in India, Digital Arrest, The Money Trap and The Human Hack
The Left-Liberal establishment is working with a vengeance to misguide people on social media without understanding the facts of important financial bills or economic reforms. The idea is to create a panic. Having looted the people over the years through various scams involving mind-boggling figures, having built up a comfortable and paying network of crony capitalists and having looted the poor by allowing large scale pilferage of anti-poverty schemes and vanishing of their money through chit funds which gave them kickbacks, the pot-bellied Congressmen and their Leftist and regional friends are dismayed that the supposedly pro-rich NDA government is plugging all loopholes to generate black money.

Take the example of alarming messages being shared on social media regarding the ‘bail-in’ clause in the proposed Financial Resolution and Deposit Insurance Bill (FRDI) 2017. Without understanding the history of deposit insurance in India and without reading the supporting sub-clauses to sec 52, the people are being told that first Modi demonetized some currency notes and now he wants to take away the money in your bank accounts. Nothing can be further from the truth. The money of the depositors will be even more secure after the FRDI is enacted.

As on date, depositors’ funds in bank accounts are guaranteed by deposit insurance of Rs 100000 only. This figure was enhanced from Rs 1500 in 1993. So, effectively, the Congress and its Leftist allies had allowed people comfort only till that amount. But even this guarantee was never invoked as the practice in India is to merge failing banks with other banks to protect customer interest. No bank has ever been allowed to go under and no depositor has lost his money till date. Instead, depositors have lost huge amounts of money in schemes floated by dubious chit funds that had political backing or at least who managed to run their operations by paying off influential politicians across the political spectrum.

The purpose of the FRDI is to streamline financial resolution and allow banks to recover their money. This bill, along with the Bankruptcy Act, will introduce a semblance of responsibility and accountability in the Indian financial system, something that has not been achieved in the long periods of Congress rule, not even during the reforms in the 1990s. Maybe it was not done on purpose as the Congress and its Leftist allies were always looking for ways to siphon out funds from the system and anything that introduced accountability would have thrown a spanner in the works!

So, instead of raising false alarms, critics would do well to first understand the provisions. In any case, the draft bill is going to be vetted by a parliamentary sub-committee that is made up of MPs from most parties who understand, or have people who can explain the intricacies to them, financial terms and the implication of ‘bail-in.’ If it is against the interests of the people, one is sure the committee is going to suggest amendments. Rumour mongering, of the kind being indulged in against the FRDI, is not good for the country.