oppn parties Gavaskar: Right About Selection Committee, Wrong About Virat Kohli

News Snippets

  • The government says Covid-19 is still in local transmission stage in India
  • Government scotches rumours of extending the lockdown beyond April14. Says no such plan
  • Centre asks states to give shelter and food to migrant workers to stop them from taking to the streets
  • RBI cuts repo rate by 75 bps, the steepest in 10 years
  • Centre writes to states regarding laxity in monitoring people who had arrived from abroad between January and March
  • Kerala reports a spurt in new cases
  • With 124 fresh cases on Friday, the number of reported cases in India stand at 854
  • Five of a family, including a 9-month-old-baby test positive for Covid-19 in Nadia district in West Bengal on Friday
  • The Pakistani army is reportedly forcibly moving all Covid-19 patients to PoK and Gilgit
  • Untimely azaans in J&K mosques spark panic gathering
  • Stocks rise - Sensex up by 1400 points and Nifty goes above the 8600 mark
  • Rahul Gandhi says the economic package is "the first step in the right direction"
  • The government announces wide-ranging measures to help the poor overcome the economic hardship caused by Covid-19
  • G20 leaders to hold a virtual meeting today to explore ways of fighting Covid-19 in a coordinated manner
  • The Delhi government orders testing of all medical staff after the positive test on a Delhi mohalla clinic doctor
Death toll reaches 27 as Covid-19 cases across India reach 974 on Saturday
oppn parties
Gavaskar: Right About Selection Committee, Wrong About Virat Kohli

By Sunil Garodia

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Writes for a number of publications.

Sunil Gavaskar has used very strong words to criticize the automatic selection of Virat Kohli as the captain of the Indian cricket team for the tour of the West Indies. He has called the selectors "lame ducks" and has said that they "lacked stature". Writing in his syndicated column, Gavaskar hinted that Kohli continues to get the team he wants as he is able to browbeat the selectors due to his superstar status while they cannot do anything as they are relatively small fries.

Gavaskar pointed out that Kohli's appointment as captain was till the World Cup. He says the selectors dispensed with the procedure by not meeting him separately, "even if it was for five minutes", to review his captaincy and announce his reappointment. Instead, they directly invited him to the meeting to select the team. This, he thinks, is highly improper and against established conventions.

While one is not enamoured of the present selection committee consisting of MSK Prasad (played 6 Tests and 17 ODIs for India), Sarandip Singh (3Tests, 5 ODIs), Gagan Khoda (2ODIs), Devang Gandhi (4 Tests, 3 ODIs) and Jatin Paranjpe (4 ODIs) and fully supports Gavaskar's view that they lack stature, one disputes his charge that while players like Kedar Jadhav and Dinesh Karthik got "dropped after below-expectations performance, the captain continues despite much below par expectations".

Did Virat Kohli fail in the World Cup? He scored a total of 443 runs in 9 innings at an average of 55.37 and a strike rate of 94.05, with 82 as his highest score. There were no hundreds, but his performance cannot be termed bad. It obviously pales in comparison with the superb Rohit Sharma but it was the second-best performance in the team. It was sad that both these players failed in the semi-final against New Zealand, but Gavaskar is wrong in picking on Kohli.

Where Gavaskar is right, though, is about the selection committee. The BCCI should immediately revise its rules to make it mandatory to appoint only those cricketers who have played a minimum of 10 Tests or 15 ODIs for India as selectors. One knows that it will be difficult to get such persons from all zones and for that, the policy of having zone-based selectors should be scrapped. It will be better to appoint two or three regional ex-first-class players as talent scouts in each region. These scouts can then report to a particular selector who will take a look at the suggested players. The selection committee should be made up of experienced cricketers and not small fries.