oppn parties Government Not Serious About Court Cases

News Snippets

  • US House of Representative Foreign Affairs Committee chief, Elliot Engel, says "Chinese aggression" against India in Ladakh shows China is "willing to bully its neighbours"
  • Cyclone Nisagra expected to hit Mumbai with wind speeds of 100 kmph. The city placed on red alert
  • Monsoon hits Kerala, IMD says northern India too will get "good" rain
  • Moody's downgrades India's sovereign rating to Baa3, bringing it at par with other rating firms.
  • If the middle seat is used on flights, the passenger must be given a wrap-around cover in addition to mask and face shield, says the DGCA
  • The Union Cabinet approves many schemes for farmers, MSMEs and street vendors that were announced in the Covid-19 economic package
  • List of banned foreign items at Army canteens withdrawn after it was found that several Indian firms were also on the list
  • India and China seem to be headed for a longer stand-off at the border as the troops of both sides bring in heavy weaponry
  • The Centre has asked ISPs to block WeTransfer, which is now not available in India
  • Major shake-up in West Bengal BJP, those who switched to the party from the TMC given important posts
  • With 7573 new cases on Monday, India's total Covid-19 cases inch towards the 2-lakh mark
  • MSP of Kharif crops raised to increase the income of farmers
  • In a setback for aviation firms, jet fuel price has been increased by 48 percent
  • Terrorists strike on the outskirts of Srinagar, kill 2 BSF men
  • Alluding to the border dispute with India, Nepal PM says "Indian virus" is more dangerous than the Chinese or Italian virus
India Commentary wishes to all its readers a very Happy Id-Ul-Fitr
oppn parties
Government Not Serious About Court Cases

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2017-01-11 09:15:33

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Writes for a number of publications.
The Supreme Court rightly castigated the government for its non-seriousness in pursuing legal cases in courts. Despite having a huge legal machinery at its disposal, the government lets cases linger. This happens only because those responsible for briefing the lawyers are either not inclined to find time for such mundane things or have been compromised by the opposing parties. If one examines the data, one will find that this is one of the major causes of the clogging of the judicial system in India.

The court also took umbrage at junior officials of ministries filing affidavits in crucial matters. The court pointedly asked the additional solicitor general “what is the status of the Supreme Court in the eyes of the bureaucracy? In your opinion, who should be the officer in all-India services filing reply affidavits?” When the government did not respond in the given time of an hour, the court proceeded to pass the caveat that from now on, all reply affidavits filed in the Supreme Court must be approved by the department and signed by the joint secretary of the concerned department. This places accountability on the head of the department which was missing.

The court’s strict stand is welcome. The government has been very casual in its approach towards court cases. There seems to be no system in place in various departments as to who is going to handle court cases, how and in what time frame. There is no transparency in such matters. It seems that senior officers generally delegate such work to their juniors with instructions to play for time. This prolongs matters and is not advisable.

The government should look into the matter and take a clear policy stand on this. Heads of departments must be made accountable. They must be given time frames within which briefs should be given to lawyers. They must ensure that lawyers go to court well prepared on the dates of hearing. In short, all efforts must be undertaken to ensure that cases do not linger due to the fault of the government.

Governance does not only mean implementing policies. It also means settling disputes that may arise on account of grievances against such policies. After all, although the legislature makes the laws, it is the government’s responsibility to ensure that they are enforced. By not being serious in handling court cases, the government shows scant respect for due process of law and encourages disrespect for law in the bureaucracy. Strong steps must be taken to reverse this state of affairs.