oppn parties Haryana Government Tries A Nelson Hold On Sportspersons

News Snippets

  • Government to introduce PF for self-emplyed and gig workers
  • Crush at Puri Rathyatra leaves 2 dead and 78 injured
  • NEET-UG, marred in controversy due to pape4r leak, saw a huge increase in top scores as two scored 715/720 and 11.2 lkah candidates cleared the exam
  • India's first hydrogen-powered train will be flagged off by PM Modi from Jind in Haryana
  • Delhi HC asks the government to monitor Sona Wnagchuk's health regularly
  • TMC Rajya Sabha MP Koel Mallick resigns from her seat, leaves TMC. Mamata asks all those wishing to leave the party to do so before July 21
  • Calcutta HC says land deed is not a proof of citizenship. Refuses to provide protection to a man facing deportation on basis of land deed
  • Supreme Court tells the government to teach the third language in the 3-language formula in Class 6 and not Class 9
  • Government to take steps to boost liquidity for small businesses
  • RBI says that banks cannot sell seized assets back to the defaulters
  • Centre decides to take equity stakes in semiconductor startups
  • Markets remain flat on Thursday: Sensex closes just 1 point ahead and Nifty ended 5 point lower
  • BCCI:Selectors have possibly decided that Rohit Sharma will not be selected for ODIs after the Lord's game on Sunday
  • Japan Open badminton: P V Sindhu stuns world no. 5 Han Yue of China 21-16, 21-14 to enter the quarterfinals
  • 2nd ODI versus England: Indian batting fails miserably except Gill, Kohli and Iyer to score just 233 all out. England win by 4 wickets
Supreme Court clarifies that it has not issued a blanket ban on use of bulldozers, and they can be used after compliance with procedure laid down in civil laws
oppn parties
Haryana Government Tries A Nelson Hold On Sportspersons

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2018-06-09 12:10:51

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Author of Cyber Scams in India, Digital Arrest, The Money Trap and The Human Hack
Wrestler Babita Pogat is right. Reading the Haryana government circular, it does seem that policies regarding sports are being made by illiterate people. But when the signature on the circular is that of Ashok Khemka, the official who has been shunted out more times than people can remember and who is a no-nonsense bureaucrat, one is surprised. It is good that chief minister ML Khattar has asked for the relevant file and put the circular on hold.

The circular makes two points. The first point decrees that athletes must deposit one-third of all that they earn from prize money and endorsement fees with the state government. The reason given is that the amount so deposited will be kept in a special fund and used to promote sports in the state. The second point decrees that the salary of athletes taking time off from their government jobs for participating in sporting events or endorsement commitments will not be given to them but deposited in the same special fund.

Who thought of this despicable idea to demand a pound of flesh from sportspersons? Do not athletes, like all other Indian citizens, pay tax on their earnings? Then why were they singled out for this extra contribution? The only reason one can think of is that some bureaucrat thought that since the government bears the cost of training athletes and gives them allowances during their struggling period, they should plough back some of their earnings when they become famous and rich. The answer to this is obvious. If the athletes are trained with public money, it is more than compensated when they bring laurels for the state and the country. Further, if the government spends money, the athletes spend a lifetime for the sport. Then, the athletes also contribute by way of income tax.

Finally, it is the government’s duty to promote sports and look after sportsmen. The only thing it can expect in return is that the athletes perform as per their talent and training and bring laurels for the state and the country. It cannot act as a baniya and ask for monetary returns. This shameless circular should not only be completely withdrawn but the thought that went into its drafting must be made public and the officer or officers, including the minister, who gave the sanction must be strongly reprimanded.