oppn parties Is Bhagwant Mann Being 'Remote-Controlled'?

News Snippets

  • R G Kar rape-murder hearing start in Kolkata's Sealdah court on Monday
  • Calcutta HC rules that a person cannot be indicted for consensual sex after promise of marriage even if he reneges on that promise later
  • Cryptocurrencies jump after Trump's win, Bitcoin goes past $84K while Dogecoin jumps 50%
  • Vistara merges with Air India today
  • GST Council to decide on zero tax on term plans and select health covers in its Dec 21-22 meeting
  • SIP inflows stood at a record Rs 25323cr in October
  • Chess: Chennai GM tournament - Aravindh Chithambaram shares the top spot with two others
  • Asian Champions Trophy hockey for women: India thrash Malaysia 4-0
  • Batteries, chains and screws were among 65 objects found in the stomach of a 14-year-old Hathras boy who died after these objects were removed in a complex surgery at Delhi's Safdarjung Hospital
  • India confirms that 'verification patrolling' is on at Demchok and Depsang in Ladakh after disengagement of troops
  • LeT commander and 2 other terrorists killed in Srinagar in a gunbattle with security forces. 4 security personnel injured too.
  • Man arrested in Nagpur for sending hoax emails to the PMO in order to get his book published
  • Adani Power sets a deadline of November 7 for Bangladesh to clear its dues, failing which the company will stop supplying power to the nation
  • Shubman Gill (90) and Rishabh Pant (60) ensure India get a lead in the final Test after which Ashwin and Jadeja reduce the visitors to 171 for 9 in the second innings
  • Final Test versus New Zealand: Match evenly poised as NZ are 143 ahead with 1 wicket in hand
Security forces gun down 10 'armed militants' in Manipur's Jiribam district but locals say those killed were village volunteers and claim that 11, and not 10, were killed
oppn parties
Is Bhagwant Mann Being 'Remote-Controlled'?

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2022-07-13 08:41:32

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator.

The creation of a temporary advisory panel, led by AAP MP Raghav Chaddha, to assist Punjab chief minister Bhagwant Mann, is rightly being viewed by the opposition parties in the state as interference in the governance of the state by the party high command. The opposition, which was already charging that the Mann government was being 'remote-controlled' by the AAP high command (read: Arvind Kejriwal) from Delhi, have now started saying that with the appointment of the Chaddha panel, even the last vestige of independence has gone. 

While this might be wrong and the panel might have been appointed just to guide the Punjab government in putting in place the so-called 'Delhi model' to work in the state, the fact remains that such a thing could have been done at the party level without the need for a separate panel being formed specifically for the purpose to 'assist' the elected government. The formation of the panel sends wrong signals which might not go down well with the people. 

The supreme leaders of all regional or small political parties are known not to trust any other leaders in the party and hence are known not to give independent decision-making responsibility to them. Arvind Kejriwal is no different. Since AAP has national ambitions, it is very important for it to ensure that the 'Delhi model' is implemented properly and in full in Punjab and more importantly, it succeeds as it has in Delhi. Only then can the party tout it as the 'Kejriwal model' when it campaigns in other states.

But the problem is that if the high command does not let state leaders work independently and continuously breathes down their necks, it might work against it in other states. The opposition will be quick to seize upon the fact and campaign against AAP in other states on that basis. It is sad that despite always saying that it is different from other mainstream parties AAP is following in their footsteps by taking steps to centralize decision making at the high command level and not letting state government work independently.