oppn parties It's Mischievous To Ban Display of Meat

News Snippets

  • NCLT initiates bankruptcy proceedings against former Videocon chairman Venugopal Dhoot for defaulting on loans of Rs 6158cr as personal guarantor in two group companies
  • LIC approves 1:1 bonus share issue
  • Gold and silver futures also go down by 0.7% and 2.2% respectively
  • Stocks tumbled again on Monday as crude prices rose: Sensex went down by 703 points and Nifty by 207 points
  • Supreme Court refuses to cancel the land-for-jobs FIR against Lalu Prasad
  • The spectre of El Nino haunts India: IMD predicts 'below normal ' monsoon this year
  • Labour protest over increase in wages by 35% (as per Haryana example) turns violent in Noida, nearly 200 were detained by the police
  • Congress leader Sonia Gandhi said that the delimitation exercise must be carried out after the Census is complete
  • PM Modi says Parliament is on the verge of creating history as the Houses get ready to take up the women's reservation bills
  • Tata Sons chairman N Chandrasekaran said that TCS COO Aarthi Subramanian is conducting a thorough inquiry to establish facts and identify individuals involved in the sexual harassment allegations at the company's Nashik office
  • Asha Bhonsle laid to rest with full state honours on Monday in Mumbai
  • AAP leader Arvind Kejriwal once again approached the Delhi HC to request the recusal of a judge from his case
  • Candidates Chess: R Vaishali on the verge of creating history, but needs two wins - one with black pieces - against formidable opponents to emerge as the challenger
  • Rohit Sharma, who retired hurt in the match versus RCB, underwent scans for possible hamstring injury
  • IPL: Abhishek Sharma fails for SRH but Ishan Kishan (91) shines. Then, Vaibhav Sooryavanshi fails for RR and SRH bolwers, especially unheralded Praful Hinge (4 for 24) and Sakib Hussain (4 for 24) win it for SRH. This was the first loss for table-toppers RR
Supreme Court questions Election Commission about SIR SOP and why logical discrepancy was introduced only in Bengal
oppn parties
It's Mischievous To Ban Display of Meat

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2017-12-29 11:56:09

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Author of Cyber Scams in India, Digital Arrest, The Money Trap and The Human Hack
A resolution has been passed in the Delhi civic body being run by the BJP that seeks to ban public display of meat products on grounds of “hygiene and sentiments”. Hygiene one can understand, but “sentiments”? There are as many meat eaters in India as there are vegetarians and eating houses displaying kebabs in skewers to attract customers is an age-old practice. So whose “sentiments” are BJP councilors talking about? If sentiments of vegetarians were really affected by the practice, there would have been daily scuffles in every area of Delhi. This is nothing more but another trick to arouse passions and drive a wedge between communities. In fact, most of these kebabs are grilled in an open area. So will there be a ban on that too?

As for hygiene, there are many other things that deserve the attention of our ‘respected’ councilors and meat on display in licensed shops should be nowhere on this list of priorities. The whole of Delhi (as any other city and town in India) is full of street vendors peddling a wide variety of eatables that pose serious health hazard. From coloured drinks to cut fruit and from rolls shallow fired in adulterated oil to dirty serving utensils, each vendor is peddling disease along with food. But no questions of hygiene are ever raised against them.

If the civic body is so concerned about hygiene, it should start a drive against these unlicensed street vendors and ensure they meet basic standards of hygiene. As for display of meat, leaving false excuses of hurt ‘sentiments’ aside, the civic body can also ask these eateries to ensure displayed skewers are suitably protected to ensure hygiene instead of enforcing a ban. The party must ensure that some of its councilors do not take up such mischievous projects that have the potential of inflaming passions and dividing communities.