oppn parties J&K: Closing National Highways Is Counter-Productive

News Snippets

  • Government to introduce PF for self-emplyed and gig workers
  • Crush at Puri Rathyatra leaves 2 dead and 78 injured
  • NEET-UG, marred in controversy due to pape4r leak, saw a huge increase in top scores as two scored 715/720 and 11.2 lkah candidates cleared the exam
  • India's first hydrogen-powered train will be flagged off by PM Modi from Jind in Haryana
  • Delhi HC asks the government to monitor Sona Wnagchuk's health regularly
  • TMC Rajya Sabha MP Koel Mallick resigns from her seat, leaves TMC. Mamata asks all those wishing to leave the party to do so before July 21
  • Calcutta HC says land deed is not a proof of citizenship. Refuses to provide protection to a man facing deportation on basis of land deed
  • Supreme Court tells the government to teach the third language in the 3-language formula in Class 6 and not Class 9
  • Government to take steps to boost liquidity for small businesses
  • RBI says that banks cannot sell seized assets back to the defaulters
  • Centre decides to take equity stakes in semiconductor startups
  • Markets remain flat on Thursday: Sensex closes just 1 point ahead and Nifty ended 5 point lower
  • BCCI:Selectors have possibly decided that Rohit Sharma will not be selected for ODIs after the Lord's game on Sunday
  • Japan Open badminton: P V Sindhu stuns world no. 5 Han Yue of China 21-16, 21-14 to enter the quarterfinals
  • 2nd ODI versus England: Indian batting fails miserably except Gill, Kohli and Iyer to score just 233 all out. England win by 4 wickets
Supreme Court clarifies that it has not issued a blanket ban on use of bulldozers, and they can be used after compliance with procedure laid down in civil laws
oppn parties
J&K: Closing National Highways Is Counter-Productive

By Linus Garg
First publised on 2019-04-08 20:18:13

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Linus tackles things head-on. He takes sides in his analysis and it fits excellently with our editorial policy. No 'maybe's' and 'allegedly' for him, only things in black and white.
Expectedly, the closure of National Highway 44’s Udhampur-Baramulla section created chaos and protests in J&K. Any national highway is the lifeline of a state as it facilitates movement of vehicles, goods and people. National Highway 44 is important in J&K as it is one of the two road that connects the valley to the rest of India. Closing down a section of it for two days a week to sanitize it for movement of security forces is both an admission on the part of the government that it has failed to secure the highway and also highly inconveniencing for the citizens.

But if the highway needs to be closed for movement of troops, it means that the government considers it unsafe. It means that the government feels that terrorists can attack the convoys. The same can also be true for hapless citizens and convoys of supplies. Civilian targets can also be attacked – in fact they have been attacked in the past – to spread terror. Are lives of ordinary citizens less valuable? Upgrading security for the highway must be both for security personnel and civilians.

Hence, closing the highway completely for two days is not the answer. In fact, in troubled areas, closing of roads results in further alienation of the people. The government has always maintained that a handful of separatist leaders and misguided youth lured by Pakistan-based terror organizations are behind the problem in Kashmir. If that is so, then instead of closing highways it should minutely examine the intelligence failure that led to the Pulwama attack. At the same time, it should make its intelligence network robust enough to keep tabs on these people creating the problems.

Movement of security forces is a major operational input in troubled areas. Obviously, it is done for the benefit of the people and to ensure peace. Sometimes it is also done to let the terrorists know that the forces are prepared and reinforcements have been put in place. The best way is that instead of closing the highway altogether, one flank can be used for troop movements on two days while the other flank can be made both ways for civilian traffic. It might create snarls but it will still be better than having no civilian movement. The other option is to move troops by air. If our netas can burn the nation’s money by flying at the drop of a hat, one feels that our soldiers can also do so to protect the nation, especially when their lives are at stake.

pic courtesy: deccan herald