oppn parties Not Mandatory For Muslims To Pray In Mosques or Idgahs

News Snippets

  • Government to introduce PF for self-emplyed and gig workers
  • Crush at Puri Rathyatra leaves 2 dead and 78 injured
  • NEET-UG, marred in controversy due to pape4r leak, saw a huge increase in top scores as two scored 715/720 and 11.2 lkah candidates cleared the exam
  • India's first hydrogen-powered train will be flagged off by PM Modi from Jind in Haryana
  • Delhi HC asks the government to monitor Sona Wnagchuk's health regularly
  • TMC Rajya Sabha MP Koel Mallick resigns from her seat, leaves TMC. Mamata asks all those wishing to leave the party to do so before July 21
  • Calcutta HC says land deed is not a proof of citizenship. Refuses to provide protection to a man facing deportation on basis of land deed
  • Supreme Court tells the government to teach the third language in the 3-language formula in Class 6 and not Class 9
  • Government to take steps to boost liquidity for small businesses
  • RBI says that banks cannot sell seized assets back to the defaulters
  • Centre decides to take equity stakes in semiconductor startups
  • Markets remain flat on Thursday: Sensex closes just 1 point ahead and Nifty ended 5 point lower
  • BCCI:Selectors have possibly decided that Rohit Sharma will not be selected for ODIs after the Lord's game on Sunday
  • Japan Open badminton: P V Sindhu stuns world no. 5 Han Yue of China 21-16, 21-14 to enter the quarterfinals
  • 2nd ODI versus England: Indian batting fails miserably except Gill, Kohli and Iyer to score just 233 all out. England win by 4 wickets
Supreme Court clarifies that it has not issued a blanket ban on use of bulldozers, and they can be used after compliance with procedure laid down in civil laws
oppn parties
Not Mandatory For Muslims To Pray In Mosques or Idgahs

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2018-05-07 13:08:34

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Author of Cyber Scams in India, Digital Arrest, The Money Trap and The Human Hack
It is a strange facet of governance in India presently that instead of taking to task those who disturb public peace and harass a community, questions marks are raised about the practices being followed by the community that is targeted. When the Hindutva mobs attacked Muslims offering namaz in open places in Gurugram, they were trying to disturb public peace. They raised mischievous slogans like “Bangladeshi wapas jao” etc. that had the potential of instigating riots. Instead of rebuking them and asking the police to round them up, chief minister Manohar Lal Khattar chose to say that namaz should be offered in mosques and idgahs instead of open public places, as if those offering prayers were the ones who were committing a crime.

There are two things that are relevant to the situation. First, the administration was aware that some Muslims offer prayers in the open. Did it ask them not to do so? Was any circular issued banning offering of prayers in open spaces? If not, then those offering the prayers were not in the wrong. Second, those who attacked them belonged to a Hindutva outfit. Did the government not receive any intelligence input that they were planning such an attack? If not then this is a serious intelligence failure. If yes, then why didn’t the administration prevent it? Was it waiting for them to strike so as to create pressure on the Muslims to force them not to offer prayers in the open?

The BJP government’s ruling in the states should recognize that Muslims constitute nearly 18% of India’s population and cannot be wished away to Pakistan or Bangladesh. They are as much India’s citizens as Hindus. If some of their practices are not as per public policy or cause disruption of life for other citizens, the government must sit with bodies representing the Muslims and work out a formula to ensure both: the religious freedom of the Muslims which includes the right to offer prayers and avoidance of disturbance to other citizens. If need be certain open public places can be earmarked for offering prayers. But allowing miscreants to attack those offering prayers is not governance, it is hooliganism.