oppn parties Not Mandatory For Muslims To Pray In Mosques or Idgahs

News Snippets

  • Crude prices fall sharply as Saudi Arabia assures normal production in a few weeks. Prices fall by 5.4% to $65.30 per barrel
  • Sensex tumbles 700 points over fears that rising crude prices will deal a body blow to the tottering Indian economy
  • As Rajeev Kumar fails to appear before the CBI despite several notices, the agency forms a special team to locate and apprehend him
  • S Jaishankar says Pakistan is not a normal neighbour and its behaviour is a "set of aberrations"
  • External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar says PoK in Indian territory and the country hopes to have physical jurisdiction over it one day
  • Barasat Sessions court near Kolkata rejects Rajeev Kumar anticipatory bail application citing lack of jurisdiction as the reason
  • PM Modi celebrates his birthday with Narmada aarti and later has lunch with his mother.
  • All 6 Bahujan Samaj Party MLAs merge with the Congress in Rajasthan
  • Bengal CM Mamata Banerjee to meet PM Modi on Wednesday, state issues on the agenda
  • Pakistan to open Kartarpur corridor on Nov 9
  • Rajeev Kumar, ex-police commissioner of Kolkata and wanted for questioning in the Sarada scam does not appear before the CBI despite the state administration requesting him to do so
  • Supreme Court asks the Centre to restore normalcy in J&K but keeping national interest in mind
  • As Trump accepts the invitation to attend a programme in Houston with PM Modi, India rushes to settle trade issues with US
  • After drone attack on Aramco's Suadi Arabia facility, oil prices jump 19% in intra-day trading causing worries for India
  • Imran Khan raises nuclear war bogey again, says if Pakistan loses a conventional war, it might fight till the end with its nuclear arsenal
Sunni Wakf Board and Nirvani Akhara write to the Supreme Court for a negotiated settlement to the Ayodhya dispute
oppn parties
Not Mandatory For Muslims To Pray In Mosques or Idgahs

By Sunil Garodia

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Writes for a number of publications.
It is a strange facet of governance in India presently that instead of taking to task those who disturb public peace and harass a community, questions marks are raised about the practices being followed by the community that is targeted. When the Hindutva mobs attacked Muslims offering namaz in open places in Gurugram, they were trying to disturb public peace. They raised mischievous slogans like “Bangladeshi wapas jao” etc. that had the potential of instigating riots. Instead of rebuking them and asking the police to round them up, chief minister Manohar Lal Khattar chose to say that namaz should be offered in mosques and idgahs instead of open public places, as if those offering prayers were the ones who were committing a crime.

There are two things that are relevant to the situation. First, the administration was aware that some Muslims offer prayers in the open. Did it ask them not to do so? Was any circular issued banning offering of prayers in open spaces? If not, then those offering the prayers were not in the wrong. Second, those who attacked them belonged to a Hindutva outfit. Did the government not receive any intelligence input that they were planning such an attack? If not then this is a serious intelligence failure. If yes, then why didn’t the administration prevent it? Was it waiting for them to strike so as to create pressure on the Muslims to force them not to offer prayers in the open?

The BJP government’s ruling in the states should recognize that Muslims constitute nearly 18% of India’s population and cannot be wished away to Pakistan or Bangladesh. They are as much India’s citizens as Hindus. If some of their practices are not as per public policy or cause disruption of life for other citizens, the government must sit with bodies representing the Muslims and work out a formula to ensure both: the religious freedom of the Muslims which includes the right to offer prayers and avoidance of disturbance to other citizens. If need be certain open public places can be earmarked for offering prayers. But allowing miscreants to attack those offering prayers is not governance, it is hooliganism.