oppn parties SC Allows Women Of All Age Groups To Enter Sabarimala Temple

News Snippets

  • Supreme Court rules that functional disability should be the deciding factor in granting road accident damages and not any doctor-issued disability certificate
  • Supreme Court flagged the fact that nearly 56% of the vehicles plying in India were uninsured and asked the government to challan them
  • An Air India flight from Phuket to Delhi encountered severe turbulence and 17 passengers were admitted to hospital with injuries
  • Calcutta HC said that heavens won't fall if Vande Matram is made mandatory to sing in madrasas
  • Kolkata Municipal Corporation has sought government nod for increasing city's wards to 200+ to keep residents in each ward between 16000 to 18000
  • Government has said that partially filled online Census forms may be allowed
  • Government may allow fees on UPI payments above Rs 2000, except on transfer between two individuals
  • Brent crude falls below $80 per barrel
  • Government has increased the LIC offer for sale to Rs 31,400cr with an additional 4% on the block
  • Stock markets become nervous on Tuesday due to Gulf situation: Sensex slides 210 points and Nifty sheds 159 points ahead of RBI MPC meets today
  • Indian cricket team lands in Sri Lanka for a 2-Test series
  • A former French Navy pilot who had alleged that IAF had lost Rafales during Operation Sindoor has been held in France on spying charges
  • An ordinary zari worked living just 100km away from Kolkata was stunned to find Rs 100cr deposited in the bank account. The bank has frozen her account pending enquiry
  • Businessmen in Kolkata gets a Rs 5-crore extortion call, allegedly from the Lawrence Bishnoi gang
  • NTA floats tenders to secure offices and exam materials round-the-clock
Tarun Tejpal, former editor of Tehelka, was sentenced to 10 years in jail by Bombay HC for raping a colleague. This judgment overturns the acquittal by a Goa sessions court
oppn parties
SC Allows Women Of All Age Groups To Enter Sabarimala Temple

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2018-09-29 17:32:20

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Author of Cyber Scams in India, Digital Arrest, The Money Trap and The Human Hack
The Supreme Court, by a 4-1 majority judgment, has ordered that the Sabarimala Temple in Kerala cannot prevent women between the ages 10 to 50 from entering the sanctum sanctorum. It has also said that devotees of Lord Ayyappa are Hindus and not any other religion. The court did not buy the argument that women within that age group menstruated and hence were “impure” to worship the deity. It was of the opinion that discrimination cannot be made against women just on the basis of physiological factors. The court also refused to recognize the practice of preventing women of that age group from entering the temple as being an integral part of religion.

It is true that given the myths surrounding menstruation, in the past Hindus used to consider it impure. There are hundreds of horrendous stories about the kind of discrimination and shame women had to face in those 5 to 7 days. In some homes, they were treated as pariahs and had to sleep, wash and eat separately. But that was an era when patriarchy ruled, education was limited and personal hygiene not so popular. In this age and time, it is criminal to think of menstruation as impure and to shame or discriminate against women for that.

The lone judge, who wrote a dissenting judgment, Justice Indu Malhotra, was of the opinion that it was not for the courts to decide which religious practices were to be struck down, except for social evils like Sati. She alluded to the fact that since Lord Ayyappa had manifested himself as ‘Nastik Brahmachari’ at Sabarimala, the practice of restricting entry of women was essential religious practice, especially since the same restriction was not applicable at 1000 other temple of the deity.

But such discrimination, practiced on whatever grounds, is abhorrent. It should always be left to the individual belief of the person concerned. If women think that they should not visit temples during their periods, so be it. But temples cannot prevent them from entering. Further, such blanket bans prevent them from worshipping the deity even on days when they are not menstruating. It goes against gender equality and needed to be stopped.