oppn parties SC: Stern Action Taken Against Tamperers Of Order On The Website

News Snippets

  • NCLT initiates bankruptcy proceedings against former Videocon chairman Venugopal Dhoot for defaulting on loans of Rs 6158cr as personal guarantor in two group companies
  • LIC approves 1:1 bonus share issue
  • Gold and silver futures also go down by 0.7% and 2.2% respectively
  • Stocks tumbled again on Monday as crude prices rose: Sensex went down by 703 points and Nifty by 207 points
  • Supreme Court refuses to cancel the land-for-jobs FIR against Lalu Prasad
  • The spectre of El Nino haunts India: IMD predicts 'below normal ' monsoon this year
  • Labour protest over increase in wages by 35% (as per Haryana example) turns violent in Noida, nearly 200 were detained by the police
  • Congress leader Sonia Gandhi said that the delimitation exercise must be carried out after the Census is complete
  • PM Modi says Parliament is on the verge of creating history as the Houses get ready to take up the women's reservation bills
  • Tata Sons chairman N Chandrasekaran said that TCS COO Aarthi Subramanian is conducting a thorough inquiry to establish facts and identify individuals involved in the sexual harassment allegations at the company's Nashik office
  • Asha Bhonsle laid to rest with full state honours on Monday in Mumbai
  • AAP leader Arvind Kejriwal once again approached the Delhi HC to request the recusal of a judge from his case
  • Candidates Chess: R Vaishali on the verge of creating history, but needs two wins - one with black pieces - against formidable opponents to emerge as the challenger
  • Rohit Sharma, who retired hurt in the match versus RCB, underwent scans for possible hamstring injury
  • IPL: Abhishek Sharma fails for SRH but Ishan Kishan (91) shines. Then, Vaibhav Sooryavanshi fails for RR and SRH bolwers, especially unheralded Praful Hinge (4 for 24) and Sakib Hussain (4 for 24) win it for SRH. This was the first loss for table-toppers RR
Supreme Court questions Election Commission about SIR SOP and why logical discrepancy was introduced only in Bengal
oppn parties
SC: Stern Action Taken Against Tamperers Of Order On The Website

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2019-02-16 19:51:36

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Author of Cyber Scams in India, Digital Arrest, The Money Trap and The Human Hack
In a disturbing development that happened for the first time, some officials of the Supreme Court tampered with an order posted on the website of the apex court. CJI Ranjan Gogoi, in his trademark no-nonsense attitude, immediately took stern action to dismiss two officers who maintained the content and were culpable. He has also held a meeting with all the registrars and their deputies to explore whether this incident was limited to the two sacked officers or others could have been involved. An inquiry has been ordered.

The incident related to an order for the personal appearance of embattled industrialist Anil Ambani in contempt of court case against him for repayment of sums of money to mobile equipment company Ericsson. The apex court had ordered for his personal appearance in the case. But the order was tampered with two days after it was first loaded on the website and the word “not” was added to make it appear as if the judges had exempted Ambani from personal appearance. This fact was discovered by Ericsson whose lawyers immediately brought it to the notice of the court, leading to the dismissals and inquiry. Ambani personally appeared in the court on the date of the hearing and the judgment is reserved.

This is a very serious matter that needs thorough investigation. Court orders are important documents and those entrusted with the duty of posting them on the website cannot be allowed to play with them. Since litigants and their lawyers access the orders online, even if a single word is altered it will change the meaning of the order and maybe make the subsequent line of prosecution or defense meaningless. Further, people will start losing faith in orders posted online. Hence, the CJI must be commended for taking prompt action to nip the mischief in the bud. Those who carried out the actual tampering and those who obviously greased palms to get it done must be handed out exemplary punishment.