oppn parties States Must Accept Reforms For Additional Borrowing

News Snippets

  • Supreme Court pulls up Central Adoption Resource Agency (CARA) for its 'obstructionist' approach in clearing files
  • Supreme Court ruled that collegium decisions on selection of judges are not open to judicial scrutiny and cannot be made public under RTI
  • Controversy erupts as Bengal government renames Suhrawardy Avenue in Central Kolkata. Opposition parties and historians say that the government has done an uncle-nephew mistake in the Suhrawardy name but BJP says the entire clan is abominable and the name itself needs to be eradicated from public places
  • Maharashtra deputy CM, Eknath Shinde, says Operation Tiger is successful as 6 rebel Shiv Sena UBT MPs join his party
  • Bengal finance minister Swapan Dasgupta presents his and the BJP government's first Budget focused on growth and doles. Promises to dismantle TMC's extortion and syndicate raj
  • Rebel TMC bloc removes Mamata Banerjee as party supremo, claims 'original' party tag for itself
  • Meta buys into Cred, appoints Cred founder Kunal Shah as head of WhatsApp
  • Core sector grows at just 0.5% in May, the slowest in 7 months
  • IT-department tells employers to analyse mismatch in salary filings, seeks to track bogus claims
  • Stocks have a volatile trading session on Monday: Sensex closes 291 points up and Nifty gains 89 points
  • FIFA World Cup: Iran hold Belgium to 0-0 draw, keep hopes alive in Group G
  • FIFA World Cup: Egypt beat New Zealand 3-1 as Md Salah scores one and sets up another
  • FIFA World Cup: Cabo Verde continue dream run, hold Uruguay to 2-2 draw, score their first World Cup goal
  • Hardik Pandya opts for Performance Block, the new initiative of BCCI Centre of Excellence, to push his comeback bid
  • Chhattisgarh HC rules that if the government does not issue appointment letters to doctors within the time stipulated in the Meidcal Rules, the doctors are released from the service bond and the government cannot demand payment of bond amount or penalty
Fire in gaming studio building in Lucknow kills 15 /////// 12 Indians among 13 killed in gas plant blast in Qatar
oppn parties
States Must Accept Reforms For Additional Borrowing

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2020-05-24 19:21:51

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Author of Cyber Scams in India, Digital Arrest, The Money Trap and The Human Hack

As part of the Covid-19 package, the Centre has allowed the states to borrow up to 5% of their GDP. This is 2% more than the limit now. However, the Centre has attached several conditions before the states can do so.

The first 0.5% additional borrowing is unconditional and can be availed immediately. But to borrow the next 1% more, the states will have to accept reforms in the following four areas - agree to come under one nation, one ration card scheme, introduce ease of doing business measures as directed by the Centre, reform of power distribution companies and fiscal empowerment of local bodies. The final 0.5% additional borrowing is conditional to the states showing progress in any one of the four reform areas.

Some states are objecting to these conditions and are calling it "arm-twisting" or "blackmail". But is it really so? If states do not act responsibly, no amount of subsidy or borrowing will reverse their perennial shortfall of funds. The worst part is that the shortfall of funds is not always due to development work. Most of it is because the states keep illogical restrictions and red tape in allowing new business units, are oblivious to power theft and force discoms to give free power to a wide range of constituents and allow 'leakage' of funds from development schemes by not empowering local bodies and allowing crony capitalists to handle many such schemes through many innovative funds siphoning-off channels.

Now if the Centre wants the states to rectify the situation and show an inclination to be responsible by following these reforms, it cannot be called blackmail. It is just the stick which the Centre can use to ensure that the states do not waste funds. It can be said that in a federal structure, the Centre cannot interfere in the working of the states. But a condition to adhere to fiscal responsibility can always be attached to any provision for allowing additional borrowing. After all, the original limit of borrowing 3% of the GDP was also set to keep the profligacy of the states in check. Any increase in that limit should always come with conditions and the states should accept it for their own good.

But the states should force the government to first release the funds that are due to them. Borrowing entails a cost (as it is, the state' cost of borrowing is more than that of the Centre) and the states should borrow only if it is absolutely necessary. If the Centre releases the funds due to the states, many states will not have to borrow the full additional 2% being allowed to them. Alternatively, the states should ask the Centre to bear the interest burden of this additional borrowing as it is mainly on account of funds blocked by it.