oppn parties UP Bus Conductor's Suicide: Who Is Responsbile?

News Snippets

  • Government to introduce PF for self-emplyed and gig workers
  • Crush at Puri Rathyatra leaves 2 dead and 78 injured
  • NEET-UG, marred in controversy due to pape4r leak, saw a huge increase in top scores as two scored 715/720 and 11.2 lkah candidates cleared the exam
  • India's first hydrogen-powered train will be flagged off by PM Modi from Jind in Haryana
  • Delhi HC asks the government to monitor Sona Wnagchuk's health regularly
  • TMC Rajya Sabha MP Koel Mallick resigns from her seat, leaves TMC. Mamata asks all those wishing to leave the party to do so before July 21
  • Calcutta HC says land deed is not a proof of citizenship. Refuses to provide protection to a man facing deportation on basis of land deed
  • Supreme Court tells the government to teach the third language in the 3-language formula in Class 6 and not Class 9
  • Government to take steps to boost liquidity for small businesses
  • RBI says that banks cannot sell seized assets back to the defaulters
  • Centre decides to take equity stakes in semiconductor startups
  • Markets remain flat on Thursday: Sensex closes just 1 point ahead and Nifty ended 5 point lower
  • BCCI:Selectors have possibly decided that Rohit Sharma will not be selected for ODIs after the Lord's game on Sunday
  • Japan Open badminton: P V Sindhu stuns world no. 5 Han Yue of China 21-16, 21-14 to enter the quarterfinals
  • 2nd ODI versus England: Indian batting fails miserably except Gill, Kohli and Iyer to score just 233 all out. England win by 4 wickets
Supreme Court clarifies that it has not issued a blanket ban on use of bulldozers, and they can be used after compliance with procedure laid down in civil laws
oppn parties
UP Bus Conductor's Suicide: Who Is Responsbile?

By Linus Garg
First publised on 2023-09-01 08:21:44

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Linus tackles things head-on. He takes sides in his analysis and it fits excellently with our editorial policy. No 'maybe's' and 'allegedly' for him, only things in black and white.

In a tragic incident, bus conductor Mohit Yadav, a contractual employee of the UP State Transport Corporation (UPSTC), was found dead alongside railway tracks in what appeared to be a suicide. Yadav was depressed since June when he lost his job after he ostensibly stopped the bus to let some passengers urinate. During the stoppage, a couple of Muslim passengers alighted from the bus and offered namaz on the side of the road. Some passengers in the bus made a video of the same and posted it in social media, alleging that the bus had been stopped by Yadav to facilitate the namaz of the Muslim passengers. Yadav was sacked for that and was unable to look after his family without income. He often talked about taking the extreme step if he did not get his job back.

It is a given fact that in India, state transport buses stop for many reasons. Hence, even if Yadav had stopped the bus to facilitate namaz, was it a crime? It is reported that the bus did not stop for more than a few minutes and other passengers had requested the stoppage as they wanted to urinate. As India is being pushed towards Islamophobia, a simple act of Muslim passengers offering namaz when the bus had stopped for some other reason is being twisted to allege that Yadav stopped the bus for them. Did the UPSTC conduct a fair inquiry before dismissing Yadav? It is also being reported that not only was Yadav suspended from duty, he was abused and insulted by senior officials.

A life has been lost due to the reduced tolerance level of some passengers and uncaring UPSTC officials who did not think it fit to verify facts and let their bias rule their mind.