oppn parties Why Smriti Irani Is Wrong

News Snippets

  • 2nd ODI: Rohit Sharma roars back to form with a scintillating ton as India beat England by 4 wickets in a high scoring match in Cuttack
  • Supreme Court will appoint an observer for the mayoral poll in Chandigarh
  • Government makes it compulsory for plastic carry bag makers to put a QR or barcode with their details on such bags
  • GBS outbreak in Pune leaves 73 ill with 14 on ventilator. GBS is a rare but treatable autoimmune disease
  • Madhya Pradesh government banned sale and consumption of liquor at 19 religious sites including Ujjain and Chitrakoot
  • Odisha emerges at the top in the fiscal health report of states while Haryana is at the bottom
  • JSW Steel net profit takes a massive hit of 70% in Q3
  • Tatas buy 60% stake in Pegatron, the contractor making iPhone's in India
  • Stocks return to negative zone - Sensex sheds 329 points to 76190 and Nifty loses 113 points to 23092
  • Bumrah, Jadeja and Yashasvi Jaiswal make the ICC Test team of the year even as no Indian found a place in the ODI squad
  • India take on England in the second T20 today at Chennai. They lead the 5-match series 1-0
  • Ravindra Jadeja excels in Ranji Trophy, takes 12 wickets in the match as Saurashtra beat Delhi by 10 wickets. All other Team India stars disappoint in the national tournament
  • Madhya Pradesh HC says collectors must not apply NSA "under political pressure and without application of mind"
  • Oxfam charged by CBI over violation of FCRA
  • Indian students in the US have started quitting part-time jobs (which are not legally allowed as per visa rules) over fears of deportation
Manipur Chief Minister Biren Singh resigns after meeting Home Minister Amit Shah and BJP chief J P Nadda /////// President's Rule likely in Manipur
oppn parties
Why Smriti Irani Is Wrong

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2022-02-03 14:44:56

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator.

What the Union women and child development minister Smriti Irani said in the Rajya Sabha on marriages, domestic violence and marital rape in reply to a query from a CPI MP seeking to know whether the government had taken note of Section 3 of the Domestic Violence Act and Section 375 of the IPC was like looking at things only in black and white. Irani said that condemning every marriage as violent and every man as rapist was not "advisable". That is absolutely true. 

But similarly, and more importantly, treating every marriage as blissful and every man as a sexual conservative who will take his wife's no for a no is also not advisable.  A huge number of marriages are violent and a huge number of men do rape their wives by going ahead with sexual intercourse against their wishes. The Domestic Violence Act was enacted to protect women from abusive husbands and their families. Now, an amendment (to drop the exception granted to a husband) to Section 375 of the IPC is being demanded to protect women from sexually abusive husbands.

It is wrong to assume that marriage bestows an inalienable right on husbands to have sex on demand with their wives. That would make the institution of marriage one-sided. If it takes two to make a couple, the wishes and desires of both have to be accounted for in the relationship. There may be hundreds of reasons for which a wife would not like to have sex with her husband on a given day or a particular time. If the husband does not understand that, does not respect her wishes and goes ahead with the act despite her refusal, he has to be treated as rapist despite what the law says.

It is no one's case that every marriage is violent and every man is rapist. But there are plenty of men who display violent sexual behavior and rape their wives. They escape punishment because the law is in their favour. The institution of marriage will become stronger if the law is changed and wives are allowed to call out these beasts who degrade them and violate their dignity just because they are husbands. For, there are certain lakhsman rekhas which husbands must also not cross.