oppn parties Why Smriti Irani Is Wrong

News Snippets

  • Government to introduce PF for self-emplyed and gig workers
  • Crush at Puri Rathyatra leaves 2 dead and 78 injured
  • NEET-UG, marred in controversy due to pape4r leak, saw a huge increase in top scores as two scored 715/720 and 11.2 lkah candidates cleared the exam
  • India's first hydrogen-powered train will be flagged off by PM Modi from Jind in Haryana
  • Delhi HC asks the government to monitor Sona Wnagchuk's health regularly
  • TMC Rajya Sabha MP Koel Mallick resigns from her seat, leaves TMC. Mamata asks all those wishing to leave the party to do so before July 21
  • Calcutta HC says land deed is not a proof of citizenship. Refuses to provide protection to a man facing deportation on basis of land deed
  • Supreme Court tells the government to teach the third language in the 3-language formula in Class 6 and not Class 9
  • Government to take steps to boost liquidity for small businesses
  • RBI says that banks cannot sell seized assets back to the defaulters
  • Centre decides to take equity stakes in semiconductor startups
  • Markets remain flat on Thursday: Sensex closes just 1 point ahead and Nifty ended 5 point lower
  • BCCI:Selectors have possibly decided that Rohit Sharma will not be selected for ODIs after the Lord's game on Sunday
  • Japan Open badminton: P V Sindhu stuns world no. 5 Han Yue of China 21-16, 21-14 to enter the quarterfinals
  • 2nd ODI versus England: Indian batting fails miserably except Gill, Kohli and Iyer to score just 233 all out. England win by 4 wickets
Supreme Court clarifies that it has not issued a blanket ban on use of bulldozers, and they can be used after compliance with procedure laid down in civil laws
oppn parties
Why Smriti Irani Is Wrong

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2022-02-03 14:44:56

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Author of Cyber Scams in India, Digital Arrest, The Money Trap and The Human Hack

What the Union women and child development minister Smriti Irani said in the Rajya Sabha on marriages, domestic violence and marital rape in reply to a query from a CPI MP seeking to know whether the government had taken note of Section 3 of the Domestic Violence Act and Section 375 of the IPC was like looking at things only in black and white. Irani said that condemning every marriage as violent and every man as rapist was not "advisable". That is absolutely true. 

But similarly, and more importantly, treating every marriage as blissful and every man as a sexual conservative who will take his wife's no for a no is also not advisable.  A huge number of marriages are violent and a huge number of men do rape their wives by going ahead with sexual intercourse against their wishes. The Domestic Violence Act was enacted to protect women from abusive husbands and their families. Now, an amendment (to drop the exception granted to a husband) to Section 375 of the IPC is being demanded to protect women from sexually abusive husbands.

It is wrong to assume that marriage bestows an inalienable right on husbands to have sex on demand with their wives. That would make the institution of marriage one-sided. If it takes two to make a couple, the wishes and desires of both have to be accounted for in the relationship. There may be hundreds of reasons for which a wife would not like to have sex with her husband on a given day or a particular time. If the husband does not understand that, does not respect her wishes and goes ahead with the act despite her refusal, he has to be treated as rapist despite what the law says.

It is no one's case that every marriage is violent and every man is rapist. But there are plenty of men who display violent sexual behavior and rape their wives. They escape punishment because the law is in their favour. The institution of marriage will become stronger if the law is changed and wives are allowed to call out these beasts who degrade them and violate their dignity just because they are husbands. For, there are certain lakhsman rekhas which husbands must also not cross.