By Linus Garg
First publised on 2026-06-09 06:15:01
In a major relief to the embattled telecom companies, Bombay High Court quashed the 2012 government order levying a retrospective one-time spectrum fee from 2008. The telcos were for long arguing that levying of such fees amounted to changing the terms of the ongoing licence and was unfair.
The court agreed. It said that the government cannot unilaterally alter the financial terms of telecom licenses years after they had been granted. It said that introducing an additional charge, over and above what the telcos were already paying as per the terms of the license, amounted to changing the deal.
A division bench of Justices Manish Pitale and Shreeram Shirsat also set aside the consequential demand notices issued to the companies and directed the authorities to return the bank guarantees furnished following interim orders.
Unless the Centre prefers an appeal in the Supreme Court against this order, this brings to close an unsavoury chapter in Indian business where companies were burdened with an enormous charge that was not even in the picture when spectrum licenses were issued.
The government has to understand that any business applies for a license after working out the cost-benefit arithmetic. If the telcos thought that paying X for the license would bring them profits, they bid and got it. But if the government, in a bid to "maximise revenue" asks them to pay Y more after several years of operation, their operations might not work out. Further, it is also highly unfair, against legal principles and laws of contract.










