oppn parties Bombay HC Quashes One-Time Spectrum Levy On Telecom Licenses

News Snippets

  • FSSAI to now train its lenses on claims like 'natural', 'heart-friendly' 'healthy' and 'no added sugar' etc to reduce instaces of misleading claims on food packaging
  • 5 killed and 18 injured as the under-construction roof of the Hanuman temple in Parbhani in Maharashtra collapses
  • Hindus in Bangladesh hold torch marches in Dhaka and other parts of the country to protest against alleged government inaction after vandalism at temples and hitting Hindu dieties with shoes during a procession
  • LIC issues notice to Suruchi Sangha (formerly controlled by TMC minister Aroop Biswas) to vacate 23 cottahs of land in Kolkata's upscale New Alipore area, which the club has allegedly poached on to hold its annual Durga Puja, within a month
  • Centre bans 16 fixed drug combinations, including painkillers, anti-biotics and skin fromulations, over safety issues
  • TMC news: Aroop Biswas and Firhad Hakim, once considered the right and left hands of Mamata Banerjee, now fall out of favour. Biswas issued showcause for writing s debit-freeze letter to HDFC Bank blocking party funds and Hakim removed from disciplinary committee
  • From Tarakeshwar in Bengal, PM Modi gives a call for 'new Bengal' and says the period of 'cut money' has ended and work has started on stalled projects in the state with the BJP government taking decisions at 'lightening speed'
  • A trader in Noida found a Rs 25l akh diamond in a Panna mine registered in his wife's name
  • 22.7 lakh to sit for NEET retest today
  • FIFA World Cup: Brazil get into the groove, score 3 against Haiti for a 3-0 win
  • FIFA World Cup: Paraguay beat Turkiye 1-0
  • FIFA World Cup: USA beat Australia 2-0 to enter knockouts and Morocco beat Scotland 1-0
  • ICC T20 Women's World Cup: India to play South Africa today
  • Nations Cup Women's Hockey: India thrash Chile 6-0 in the semifinals to set up a clash with New Zealand in the final
  • 3rd ODI versus Afghanistan: Yasashvi Jaiswal (110 not out) and Prasidh Krishna (5-23) shine as India (224 for 1) beat Afghanistan (218) by 9 wickets in the 3rd and final ODI to sepp the series 3-0
PM Modi celebrates International Yoga Day with more than 40000 people from Red Road in Kolkata /////// NEET re-test today with NTA saying it is committed to conduct it smoothly
oppn parties
Bombay HC Quashes One-Time Spectrum Levy On Telecom Licenses

By Linus Garg
First publised on 2026-06-09 06:15:01

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Linus tackles things head-on. He takes sides in his analysis and it fits excellently with our editorial policy. No 'maybe's' and 'allegedly' for him, only things in black and white.

In a major relief to the embattled telecom companies, Bombay High Court quashed the 2012 government order levying a retrospective one-time spectrum fee from 2008. The telcos were for long arguing that levying of such fees amounted to changing the terms of the ongoing licence and was unfair.

The court agreed. It said that the government cannot unilaterally alter the financial terms of telecom licenses years after they had been granted. It said that introducing an additional charge, over and above what the telcos were already paying as per the terms of the license, amounted to changing the deal.

A division bench of Justices Manish Pitale and Shreeram Shirsat also set aside the consequential demand notices issued to the companies and directed the authorities to return the bank guarantees furnished following interim orders.

Unless the Centre prefers an appeal in the Supreme Court against this order, this brings to close an unsavoury chapter in Indian business where companies were burdened with an enormous charge that was not even in the picture when spectrum licenses were issued.

The government has to understand that any business applies for a license after working out the cost-benefit arithmetic. If the telcos thought that paying X for the license would bring them profits, they bid and got it. But if the government, in a bid to "maximise revenue" asks them to pay Y more after several years of operation, their operations might not work out. Further, it is also highly unfair, against legal principles and laws of contract.