oppn parties Mutual Consent Divorce: Waiting Period Can be Waived Only by Supreme Court

News Snippets

  • MS Dhoni decides to take a two-month break, will skip West Indies tour but will not retire
  • Phagu Chauhan is the new Governor of Bihar while Ramesh Bais has been appointed as that of Tripura
  • Governors: Anandiben Patel shifted from Madhya Pradesh to Uttar Pradesh and Lalji Tandon from Bihar to Madhya Pradesh
  • Naga talks interlocutor RN Ravi appointed as Governor of Nagaland
  • Noted lawyer Jagdeep Dhankhar appointed as new Governor of West Bengal
  • 84 NDRF teams have been despatched to 23 states to tackle the flood situation
  • Three persons lynched in Bihar after being accused of cattle theft
  • Delhi police seize a consignment of 1500 kgs of heroin and busts a cartel of Afghanistan-Pakistan narcotics dealers with links to the Taliban
  • Supreme Court gives 9 more months to complete the Babri Masjid demolition case trial
  • Priyanka Gandhi not allowed to meet the families of the dead in the Sonabhadra firing, arrested
  • ICC inducts Sachin Tendulkar in [email protected]@@s Hall of Fame
  • Stock markets bleed for the second day. Sensex crashes 560 points
  • S Jaishankar, Minister of External Affairs, says Pakistan should release and repatriate Kulbhushan Jadhav immediately
  • Karnataka Governor Vajubhai Vala asks the Speaker to hold the trust vote latest by 1.30 pm today
  • The Government sends a list of 24 questions to mobile app company that runs video app TikTok seeking answers for anti-national and obscene content carried on the platform
Former Delhi CM and senior Congress leader Sheila Dikshit dies following a cardiac arrest. She was 81
oppn parties
Mutual Consent Divorce: Waiting Period Can be Waived Only by Supreme Court

By Sunil Garodia

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Writes for a number of publications.
The Supreme Court has once again invoked powers granted to it under Article 142 of the constitution to dispense “complete justice” and granted divorce by mutual consent to a couple without waiting for the mandatory waiting period to be over. In the case Aditi Wadhera v Vivek Kumar Wadhera, the court took the view that invocation of Article 142 was justified and required to meet the ends of justice, and granted divorce to the couple after they submitted that they had resolved all pending and contentious issues amicably.

Ever since the apex court used this discretion in Anjana Kishore v Puneet Kishore, lower courts and high courts thought it was a precedent and for some time chose to waive off this mandatory waiting period, disregarding the fact that it was there in the statute to allow the parties to attempt a reconciliation. Only the Supreme Court could use Article 142 to grant immediate divorce in rare cases where it was justified. It took a clarification from the apex court in Anil Kumar Jain v Maya Jain to put a stop to the practice in lower courts.

The couple has to live separately for one year, file for grant of divorce by mutual consent thereafter and then wait for six months before the divorce decree can be issued in lower courts. It is also required that mutual consent of both partners is there at both times – when filing the application and six months later when the order is to be made. In case of urgency, only a special leave petition before the apex court can get them an early divorce if the court thinks fit to pass an order by invoking Article 142.