oppn parties Permanent Blacklisting of Contractors is Illegal

News Snippets

  • India will fast-track deployment of 52 defence surveillance satellites
  • In a first, Hinduja Hospital in Mumbai helps patients draw up living will
  • Calcutta HC says that an arrest warrant cannot be issued against an accused who is on anticipatory bail, and if that person is arrested, he or she must be released as per the conditions of the anticipatory bail
  • Monsoon covers entire India 9 days ahead of schedule
  • Maharashtra government scraps order making Hindi the 3rd language in state schools after protests by civil society and opposition
  • A government report says that 64.3% of the population is now under the social security net, up from only 22% in 2016
  • The finance ministry has asked PSB to look at ways to monetise their investment in subsidiaries, by listing them on the stock exchanges
  • After auditor flags overlimit expenses, Karnataka Bank MD & CEO S Hari Hara Sarma and ED Sekhar Rao resign
  • Rosneft likely to sell its stake in Nayara Energy to RIL
  • Ola junks commission-based income model, opts for a daily flat fee from drivers with the hope of attracting more drivers to its platform
  • Torrent Pharma will acquire a controlling stake in JB Chem for Rs 18000cr by buying 46.4% from US fund KKR and another 26% from the public by making an open offer
  • Speculation persists over Jasprit Bumrah making the playing 11 in the second Test against England starting July 2
  • FIH Pro hockey: Indian women slump to their 8th successive loss as they lose to China 2-3
  • US Open BWF Super 300 badminaton: Ayush Shetty wins his first BWF world title by beating Canadian Brian Young 21-18,21-13 but Tanvi Sharma lost in the finals to Beiwwwan Zhang 11-21, 21-16, 10-21
  • R Praggananda wins Tashkent meet, become number 1 chess player in India with FIDE rating of 2799
The SIT formed to probe law college gang-rape in Kolkata has collected the hockey stick used to hit the victim and other rape evidence from the coolege campus /////// Rath Yatra stampede in Puri kills 3
oppn parties
Permanent Blacklisting of Contractors is Illegal

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2016-07-27 13:42:08

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator.
The Supreme Court has said that blacklisting of a contractor firm for an indefinite period is impermissible in law. In the case B.K.Biyani Projects Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Madhya Pradesh and Ors., the court held that if a contractor firm deviated from contract terms, it cannot be penalized for it for an indefinite period. Hence, it cannot be the case of any contract awarding authority not to allow a contractor to compete for future contracts after a reasonable length of time has passed since his blacklisting. In the instant case, the court said that the passage of three years was a long enough time for the contractor to become eligible for competing for contracts again.

In the instant case, the contractor had delayed six projects awarded to him by the state. The firm was debarred for an indefinite period by an order dated 14th March 2013.

Flipkart offers mega deals everyday. Shop here

The court cited the case Kulja Industries Ltd. v CGM, Western Telecom Project, BSNL & Ors. in which the apex court had opined that “suffice it to say that “debarment” is recognized and often used as an effective method for disciplining deviant suppliers/contractors who may have committed acts of omission and commission or frauds including misrepresentations, falsification of records and other breaches of the regulations under which such contracts were allotted. What is notable is that the “debarment” is never permanent and the period of debarment would invariably depend upon the nature of the offence committed by the erring contractor.”

The court then said that “as mentioned above, the order for blacklisting the appellant is a permanent one. This is impermissible in law. Since the appellant was blacklisted by an order 14th March 2013 and since three years have gone by during which period the appellant has suffered blacklisting and also taking into consideration the fact that three out of six contracts have been completed by the appellant, we are of the opinion that the period of blacklisting already undergone by the appellant is sufficient to meet the ends of justice.”

Despite earlier judgments in this matter, government officers are so full of their authority that they pass illegal orders debarring contractor firms for indefinite period. This goes against the principles of natural justice. A person or a firm can only be handed out punishment according to the gravity of the deviation committed. This order has clarified the situation.

Have you got your deal at Flipkart today? Get it here