oppn parties Permanent Blacklisting of Contractors is Illegal

News Snippets

  • Supreme Court pulls up Central Adoption Resource Agency (CARA) for its 'obstructionist' approach in clearing files
  • Supreme Court ruled that collegium decisions on selection of judges are not open to judicial scrutiny and cannot be made public under RTI
  • Controversy erupts as Bengal government renames Suhrawardy Avenue in Central Kolkata. Opposition parties and historians say that the government has done an uncle-nephew mistake in the Suhrawardy name but BJP says the entire clan is abominable and the name itself needs to be eradicated from public places
  • Maharashtra deputy CM, Eknath Shinde, says Operation Tiger is successful as 6 rebel Shiv Sena UBT MPs join his party
  • Bengal finance minister Swapan Dasgupta presents his and the BJP government's first Budget focused on growth and doles. Promises to dismantle TMC's extortion and syndicate raj
  • Rebel TMC bloc removes Mamata Banerjee as party supremo, claims 'original' party tag for itself
  • Meta buys into Cred, appoints Cred founder Kunal Shah as head of WhatsApp
  • Core sector grows at just 0.5% in May, the slowest in 7 months
  • IT-department tells employers to analyse mismatch in salary filings, seeks to track bogus claims
  • Stocks have a volatile trading session on Monday: Sensex closes 291 points up and Nifty gains 89 points
  • FIFA World Cup: Iran hold Belgium to 0-0 draw, keep hopes alive in Group G
  • FIFA World Cup: Egypt beat New Zealand 3-1 as Md Salah scores one and sets up another
  • FIFA World Cup: Cabo Verde continue dream run, hold Uruguay to 2-2 draw, score their first World Cup goal
  • Hardik Pandya opts for Performance Block, the new initiative of BCCI Centre of Excellence, to push his comeback bid
  • Chhattisgarh HC rules that if the government does not issue appointment letters to doctors within the time stipulated in the Meidcal Rules, the doctors are released from the service bond and the government cannot demand payment of bond amount or penalty
Fire in gaming studio building in Lucknow kills 15 /////// 12 Indians among 13 killed in gas plant blast in Qatar
oppn parties
Permanent Blacklisting of Contractors is Illegal

By Sunil Garodia
First publised on 2016-07-27 13:42:08

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Author of Cyber Scams in India, Digital Arrest, The Money Trap and The Human Hack
The Supreme Court has said that blacklisting of a contractor firm for an indefinite period is impermissible in law. In the case B.K.Biyani Projects Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Madhya Pradesh and Ors., the court held that if a contractor firm deviated from contract terms, it cannot be penalized for it for an indefinite period. Hence, it cannot be the case of any contract awarding authority not to allow a contractor to compete for future contracts after a reasonable length of time has passed since his blacklisting. In the instant case, the court said that the passage of three years was a long enough time for the contractor to become eligible for competing for contracts again.

In the instant case, the contractor had delayed six projects awarded to him by the state. The firm was debarred for an indefinite period by an order dated 14th March 2013.

Flipkart offers mega deals everyday. Shop here

The court cited the case Kulja Industries Ltd. v CGM, Western Telecom Project, BSNL & Ors. in which the apex court had opined that “suffice it to say that “debarment” is recognized and often used as an effective method for disciplining deviant suppliers/contractors who may have committed acts of omission and commission or frauds including misrepresentations, falsification of records and other breaches of the regulations under which such contracts were allotted. What is notable is that the “debarment” is never permanent and the period of debarment would invariably depend upon the nature of the offence committed by the erring contractor.”

The court then said that “as mentioned above, the order for blacklisting the appellant is a permanent one. This is impermissible in law. Since the appellant was blacklisted by an order 14th March 2013 and since three years have gone by during which period the appellant has suffered blacklisting and also taking into consideration the fact that three out of six contracts have been completed by the appellant, we are of the opinion that the period of blacklisting already undergone by the appellant is sufficient to meet the ends of justice.”

Despite earlier judgments in this matter, government officers are so full of their authority that they pass illegal orders debarring contractor firms for indefinite period. This goes against the principles of natural justice. A person or a firm can only be handed out punishment according to the gravity of the deviation committed. This order has clarified the situation.

Have you got your deal at Flipkart today? Get it here