oppn parties Permanent Blacklisting of Contractors is Illegal

News Snippets

  • Mobile operators Vodafone-Idea and Airtel decide to raise tariffs from next month
  • Sharad Pawar meets Sonia Gandhi and says more time needed for government formation in Maharashtra
  • Justice S A Bobde sworn in as the 47th Chief Justice of India
  • Supreme Court holds hotels liable for theft of vehicle from their parking area if parked by valet, says "owner's risk" clause is not a shield from such liability
  • Finance Minister says she is receiving feedback from many sectors that recovery is happening as there is lower stress
  • Sabarimala temple opens, but police bar the entry of women below 50 years
  • Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman says Air India and BPCL to be sold off by March
  • Media person Rajat Sharma resigns as DDCA president
  • Shiv Sena, NCP and Congress postpone meeting the governor of Maharashtra
  • Shiv Sena not to attend the NDA meeting on 17th November, says break up "a formality"
  • Shiv Sena says that the confidence the BJP is showing about forming the government in Maharashtra is based purely on its expectation of getting numbers through horse trading
  • Anil Ambani resigns as director of the bankrupt Reliance Communications
  • India beat Bangladesh by an innings and 150 rums inside three days in the first Test. Indian pacers excel after Mayank Agarwal's double century
  • Sena-NCP-Congress work out a common minimum programme, will form the government soon and it will last 5 years, says Sharad Pawar
  • Income Tax Appellate Tribunal upholds the decision to withdraw the charitable status of Young India, making it liable to pay Rs 145 in income tax. Rahul Gandhi and Priyanka Vadra are the majority shareholders in the company
Two Muslim litigants in Ayodhya refuse to accept the Supreme Court order, say review petition might be filed
oppn parties
Permanent Blacklisting of Contractors is Illegal

By Sunil Garodia

About the Author

Sunil Garodia Editor-in-Chief of indiacommentary.com. Current Affairs analyst and political commentator. Writes for a number of publications.
The Supreme Court has said that blacklisting of a contractor firm for an indefinite period is impermissible in law. In the case B.K.Biyani Projects Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Madhya Pradesh and Ors., the court held that if a contractor firm deviated from contract terms, it cannot be penalized for it for an indefinite period. Hence, it cannot be the case of any contract awarding authority not to allow a contractor to compete for future contracts after a reasonable length of time has passed since his blacklisting. In the instant case, the court said that the passage of three years was a long enough time for the contractor to become eligible for competing for contracts again.

In the instant case, the contractor had delayed six projects awarded to him by the state. The firm was debarred for an indefinite period by an order dated 14th March 2013.

Flipkart offers mega deals everyday. Shop here

The court cited the case Kulja Industries Ltd. v CGM, Western Telecom Project, BSNL & Ors. in which the apex court had opined that “suffice it to say that “debarment” is recognized and often used as an effective method for disciplining deviant suppliers/contractors who may have committed acts of omission and commission or frauds including misrepresentations, falsification of records and other breaches of the regulations under which such contracts were allotted. What is notable is that the “debarment” is never permanent and the period of debarment would invariably depend upon the nature of the offence committed by the erring contractor.”

The court then said that “as mentioned above, the order for blacklisting the appellant is a permanent one. This is impermissible in law. Since the appellant was blacklisted by an order 14th March 2013 and since three years have gone by during which period the appellant has suffered blacklisting and also taking into consideration the fact that three out of six contracts have been completed by the appellant, we are of the opinion that the period of blacklisting already undergone by the appellant is sufficient to meet the ends of justice.”

Despite earlier judgments in this matter, government officers are so full of their authority that they pass illegal orders debarring contractor firms for indefinite period. This goes against the principles of natural justice. A person or a firm can only be handed out punishment according to the gravity of the deviation committed. This order has clarified the situation.

Have you got your deal at Flipkart today? Get it here